" /> Parker Instability | Donghui Son
Post

Parker Instability

Parker Instability


Introduction

The Parker instability (proposed by E.N. Parker in 1966) is a classic example of magnetic buoyancy instability in astrophysical plasmas. It arises in a gravitationally stratified plasma that is partially supported by a magnetic field. Under certain conditions, the field lines develop large-scale undulations, allowing parcels of magnetized plasma to rise like “bubbles.”

This mechanism helps explain:

  • Galactic disks: The formation of interstellar gas arms or loops.
  • Solar interior: The buoyant rise of magnetic flux tubes, leading to sunspots and active regions.
  • Accretion disks: The reorganization of magnetic fields and angular momentum, often alongside other instabilities like the magneto-rotational instability (MRI).

In what follows, we outline the physical setup, derive linear stability conditions, and present both a detailed approach and a simple, intuitive argument for how buoyancy competes with magnetic tension.


Physical Setup

We assume:

  1. A stratified plasma in a gravitational field $\mathbf{F}_g = \rho\,\mathbf{g}$. Let $\mathbf{g}$ point in the $z$-direction.
  2. A static initial equilibrium ($\mathbf{v}_0 = 0$) with a primarily horizontal magnetic field:

    \[\mathbf{B}_0 = B_x(z)\,\mathbf{e}_x.\]
  3. An isothermal plasma ($P \propto \rho$), so $C_s^2 = P/\rho$ is constant.
  4. A constant plasma $\beta$ in equilibrium:

    \[\beta \;=\; \frac{P_{\rm gas}}{P_{\rm mag}} \;=\; \frac{\rho_0\, C_s^2}{\,B_0^2/(8\pi)\,} \;=\; \text{const}.\]

    Equivalently, $v_A^2 = \tfrac{B_0^2}{4\pi\rho_0}$ may be constant or slowly varying.

These assumptions keep the math tractable while retaining the main physics of buoyancy and magnetic tension.


Governing MHD Equations

Under the ideal (inviscid, perfectly conducting) MHD approximation:

  1. Continuity:

    \[\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (\rho\,\mathbf{v}) = 0.\]
  2. Momentum Conservation:

    \[\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\rho\,\mathbf{v}) + \nabla \cdot \bigl(\rho\,\mathbf{v}\mathbf{v}\bigr) = -\,\nabla P_{\rm gas} + \frac{1}{4\pi}\bigl(\nabla \times \mathbf{B}\bigr)\times \mathbf{B} + \rho\,\mathbf{g}.\]

    Alternatively:

    \[\rho\,\frac{d\mathbf{v}}{dt} = -\,\nabla \Bigl(P_{\rm gas} + \tfrac{B^2}{8\pi}\Bigr) + \frac{(\mathbf{B} \cdot \nabla)\mathbf{B}}{4\pi} + \rho\,\mathbf{g}.\]
  3. Induction Equation (ideal MHD):

    \[\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} = \nabla \times \bigl(\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}\bigr).\]
  4. Isothermal Equation of State:

    \[P_{\rm gas} = \rho\,C_s^2, \quad \text{with } C_s = \text{constant}.\]

Equilibrium Configuration

We seek a static ($\mathbf{v}_0=0$) equilibrium:

  • From continuity, $\partial \rho_0/\partial t = 0$ implies $\rho_0$ is time-independent.
  • The momentum equation in equilibrium simplifies to

    \[0 \;=\; - \nabla \Bigl(P_0 + \tfrac{B_0^2}{8\pi}\Bigr) + \tfrac{(\mathbf{B}_0 \cdot \nabla)\mathbf{B}_0}{4\pi} + \rho_0\,\mathbf{g}.\]

    Since $\mathbf{B}_0 = B_x(z)\,\mathbf{e}_x$ and has no $x$-dependence, $(\mathbf{B}_0 \cdot \nabla)\mathbf{B}_0 = 0$. Hence,

    \[- \nabla \Bigl(P_0 + \tfrac{B_{x0}^2}{8\pi}\Bigr) + \rho_0\,\mathbf{g} \;=\; 0.\]

    Assuming $\mathbf{g} = -\,g\,\mathbf{e}_z$ is uniform and points downward,

    \[\frac{d}{dz}\Bigl(P_0 + \tfrac{B_{x0}^2}{8\pi}\Bigr) = -\,\rho_0\,g.\]
  • Isothermal: $P_0 = \rho_0 \, C_s^2$.
  • Constant $\beta$:

    \[\beta \;\equiv\; \frac{P_0}{B_{x0}^2/(8\pi)} \;\; \Longrightarrow \;\; B_{x0}^2 \;\propto\; \rho_0.\]

    Plugging these conditions into the above differential equation yields an exponential density profile in the simple case of a uniform $g$:

    \[\rho_0(z) = \rho_0(0)\, \exp\Bigl(-\,\tfrac{z}{H'}\Bigr), \quad \text{where}\quad H' = \frac{C_s^2\,(1+\beta^{-1})}{g}.\]

Hence, magnetic pressure effectively increases the characteristic scale height from

\[H = \frac{C_s^2}{g} \quad \text{(in the purely gas-pressure–supported case)},\]

to

\[H' = \frac{C_s^2\,(1+\beta^{-1})}{g},\]

when magnetic support is included.


Linearization and Perturbations

To study the stability, let each quantity deviate from equilibrium by a small perturbation $\delta(\cdot)$. For example:

\[\begin{aligned} \rho(\mathbf{r},t) \;&=\;\rho_0(z) + \delta \rho(\mathbf{r},t),\\ \mathbf{v}(\mathbf{r},t) \;&=\;0 + \delta \mathbf{v}(\mathbf{r},t),\\ P(\mathbf{r},t) \;&=\;P_0(z) + \delta P(\mathbf{r},t),\\ \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},t) \;&=\;\mathbf{B}_0(z) + \delta \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},t). \end{aligned}\]

We keep terms only first order in the small perturbations. For instance:

  1. Continuity (linearized):

    \[\frac{\partial \delta \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot \bigl(\rho_0\,\delta\mathbf{v}\bigr) = 0.\]

    Because the background is isothermal, we can often use:

    \[\delta\rho = \frac{\delta P}{C_s^2}.\]
  2. Momentum (linearized):

    \[\rho_0 \,\frac{\partial \delta \mathbf{v}}{\partial t} = -\,\nabla \delta P - \frac{(\mathbf{B}_0 \cdot \nabla)\,\delta\mathbf{B}}{4\pi} - \frac{(\delta\mathbf{B} \cdot \nabla)\,\mathbf{B}_0}{4\pi} + \delta\rho\;\mathbf{g}.\]

    The last term $\delta\rho\,\mathbf{g}$ represents buoyancy. If $\delta\rho < 0$ (lighter fluid), there is an upward force.

  3. Induction (linearized):

    \[\frac{\partial \delta \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} = \nabla \times \bigl(\delta\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}_0\bigr).\]

    We ignore second-order terms like $\delta \mathbf{B} \times \delta \mathbf{v}$.


Normal-Mode Analysis

We next assume perturbations have the form:

\[\delta f(x,y,z,t) = \hat{f}(z)\,\exp\Bigl\{\,i\bigl(\omega t - k_x x - k_y y\bigr)\Bigr\}.\]

This converts derivatives $\partial/\partial x$ into multiplication by $-\,i\,k_x$, etc., leaving a set of ordinary differential equations in $z$.

Key Observations

  • Short wavelengths ($k$ large) are strongly stabilized by magnetic tension.
  • Long wavelengths ($k$ small) allow buoyancy to act, but growth can become slow if the fluid must move a large distance.
  • Intermediate $\lambda$ often yields the strongest instability, balancing tension and buoyancy.

Detailed Steps in the Linear Analysis

  1. Fourier Substitute:

    Let

    \[\delta \mathbf{v}(x,y,z,t) = \bigl[\hat{v}_x(z), \hat{v}_y(z), \hat{v}_z(z)\bigr]\,e^{i(\omega t - k_x x - k_y y)}.\]

    Similarly, $\delta \mathbf{B}$, $\delta P$, and $\delta \rho$ each have $\hat{(\cdot)}(z)\exp[i(\omega t - k_x x - k_y y)]$.

  2. Use Isothermal Relation:

    $\delta \rho = \delta P / C_s^2$. Substituting this into the continuity equation yields one relationship involving $\hat{v}_x, \hat{v}_y, \hat{v}_z$ and $\hat{P}$.

  3. Linear Momentum Equations:

    Breaking them into $x$, $y$, and $z$ components gives three equations. Each component includes terms for magnetic tension $\sim k_x^2, k_y^2$, pressure gradients $\delta P$, and the buoyancy term $\delta \rho \, \mathbf{g}$.

  4. Linear Induction:

    $\delta \mathbf{B}$ is found from $\partial \delta \mathbf{B}/\partial t = \nabla \times (\delta \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}_0)$. In components, you get relations like

    \[\hat{B}_y = -\,\frac{k_x}{\omega}\,B_{x0}\,\hat{v}_y, \quad \hat{B}_z = -\,\frac{k_x}{\omega}\,B_{x0}\,\hat{v}_z, \quad \text{etc.}\]

    Substituting these back into the momentum equations produces a closed set of ODEs for $\hat{v}_x(z), \hat{v}_y(z), \hat{v}_z(z), \hat{P}(z)$, etc.

  5. Combine Equations:

    After some algebra, one obtains a pair (or a small system) of coupled ODEs in $z$. The presence of $\rho_0(z)$ and $B_{x0}(z)$ in the coefficients means the solutions must be found numerically or with further approximations (e.g., uniform $\rho_0$ or WKB expansions).

Boundary Conditions

  • Decay at Large $\lvert z \rvert$:

    For an unbounded domain, we usually require $\delta f \to 0$ as $\lvert z \rvert \to \infty$.

  • Symmetry or Antisymmetry at a midplane $z=0$:

    In a galactic disk or solar interior model, one might impose even or odd parity across $z=0$.

  • Shooting Method:

    A common technique is to guess $\omega$, integrate the ODE from $z\to\infty$ inward, and see if the midplane boundary condition is satisfied. One adjusts $\omega$ until it works—thereby finding the eigenvalue $\omega$.


Magnetic Buoyancy and Growth Conditions

Physical Interpretation of Buoyancy vs Tension

  1. Buoyancy:
    If a segment of the magnetic field is lifted upward by a small amount $\Delta z$, the plasma inside that segment remains at nearly the same magnetic pressure it had before (assuming “frozen-in” conditions along field lines). Meanwhile, the surrounding plasma is in equilibrium with local pressure. If the internal plasma is less dense (due to expansion along the field), it receives an upward net force.

  2. Magnetic Tension:
    As soon as field lines bend, a restoring tension force tries to straighten them out. The tension force magnitude is roughly

    \[F_{\text{tension}} \sim \frac{B^2}{4\pi R},\]

    where $R$ is the local radius of curvature of the bent field line.

  3. Condition for Instability:
    If the upward buoyant force on a bent segment exceeds the downward tension force, the segment continues to rise. This leads to exponential growth of the perturbation amplitude.

Typical Scale

A simplified estimate (in uniform gravity $g$ and isothermal conditions) shows that the unstable wavelengths satisfy roughly \(\lambda \;\gtrsim\; 8\,H \sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{\beta}},\) where $H = \frac{C_s^2}{g}$ is the (non-magnetic) pressure scale height. Thus, you need fairly large-scale perturbations (on the order of a few scale heights) for Parker instability to take hold (to overcome magnetic tension).

Growth Rate

Another rough estimate sets the instability timescale $\tau$ to the time it takes a fluid element to move one scale height $H$ at the Alfvén speed $v_A$:

\[\tau \sim \frac{H}{v_A}, \quad \text{so } \quad \gamma_{\text{growth}} \sim \frac{v_A}{H}.\]

Intuitive Derivation (Uniform Gravity)

In many textbooks, a simpler argument is given:

  1. Start with an isothermal, stratified atmosphere: \(\rho(z) = \rho_0 \exp\Bigl(-\frac{z}{H'}\Bigr), \quad H' = \frac{C_s^2 (1 + \beta^{-1})}{g}.\)
  2. Imagine a small portion of the horizontal magnetic field line that is lifted by $\Delta z$. Because of field-line constraints, the plasma inside this lifted portion cannot expand sideways freely; it remains at nearly the same density it had at the lower level. Meanwhile, the surrounding environment at height $z + \Delta z$ is more rarefied if $\Delta z\neq 0$. Hence the lifted portion is effectively lighter, receiving an upward buoyant force.
  3. Bend the field line in a sinusoidal shape with wavelength $\lambda$. The curvature radius $R$ in the crest of the wave is on order $\lambda^2 / (8\,\Delta z)$. This sets the tension force $\sim B^2/(4\pi R)$. Balancing it against buoyancy shows that if $\lambda$ is large enough, buoyancy wins, driving the field line upward further and further.

Astrophysical Examples

  1. Solar Coronal Loops
    In the Sun’s convection zone, strong toroidal magnetic fields can form. Parts of these fields can rise through the less dense regions, eventually piercing the photosphere. One interpretation is that the Parker instability helps local “arches” of magnetic flux tubes break through. When they reach the solar surface, they form active regions and sunspots.

  2. Galactic Disk Molecular Clouds
    Fukui et al. (2006) reported large-scale molecular cloud loops in the Galactic center region. These structures can naturally arise if sections of the interstellar magnetic field in the galactic disk become buoyant. Giant molecular clouds are carried along as the field loops arch upward, creating loop-like features in the CO emission.

  3. Accretion Disks
    In many accretion disk models, buoyant magnetic fields can redistribute angular momentum, or supply turbulence. Parker instability in conjunction with differential rotation (the magneto-rotational instability, MRI) can set the stage for efficient momentum transport.


This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.

© Donghui Son. Some rights reserved.